Just turned in the second, my second, memo for my paper to be written this semester (which according to the Swedish National Agency for Higher Education is called, and from here on in will be referred to as, Bachelor’s essay). The first one I turned in was deemed to wide (in subject) It’s ok, it happened to everyone in my class. This next one isn’t. It’s narrow. I have a meeting tomorrow with the guy/teacher/professor overseeing my writing (there probably has an English title, just can’t think of it). My question, to be answered, might not touch on the most vibrant of philosophical debates, none the less I feel it will lead me onto the right path, having to learn a lot about rationality.
So? What is then my question? Well, in a crude and not final form it sounds like this:
Is anyone, or several, of the qualities/subjects of knowledge that Rawls deprives the individuals behind the veil of ignorance necessary for the individuals to be/act/choose, in Rawls sense, rational(ly)?
(Sorry for there not being any links. Just converted to the Safari 4 Beta and it seems to have an issue with linking in WordPress.)